There are a variety of opinions on the ideal 'resting' time for coffee after it's roasted, so our Coffee Next team decided to put some scientific method to answer the question:
How long should I age my coffee before drinking it?
In short, we found that:- coffee in standard packaging (i.e. not gas-flushed) is better to drink within 1-3 weeks from roast (ideally around 1.5 weeks).
- coffee in gas-flushed packaging is at its prime after 2 weeks of shelf time.
How did we determine this?
First things first: What is Ageing? Ageing refers to the development of coffee flavours over time, typically with positive connotation. Staling refers to the same thing with negative connotation. Whether you refer to the development as staling or aging, detectable taste changes occur to roasted coffee over time. Changes to a coffees taste result from two different natural phenomena:- Chemical transportation
- Chemical transformation
What did we do? (How did we test this?)
We planned our experiments to observe quantifiable and qualitative changes to three different coffees over time: a light roast blend, a medium roast blend, and a dark roast blend. These coffees were all roasted on the same day with the same environmental background conditions. We observed the difference between gas flushed** (2 parts per hundred [pph] oxygen) and non-gas flushed products (21pph). The coffees were tasted at increments of 1,2,4 and 8 weeks of shelf life. (** – gas flushing refers to the process of adding nitrogen during packing to delay oxidation and extend shelf life)- We tested the coffees with five trained coffee tasters (including a certified Q-grader).
- We took into account palate variability and recorded this in our results (i.e. differences in perceived quality).
- We scored the coffees out of 5 in categories of sweetness, mouthfeel, milk cut-through (yes, we tested in both milk and black), and balance.
- We also mapped the observed flavour of the coffees over the course of time.
- Ambient temperature was not monitored or controlled in this study (Phase 2 will look at this) – however our storeroom temp is typically in the range 18C – 26C
- Other factors that were not controlled in this test were relative humidity during roasting, holdup time in packing and ambient pressure (Phase 2)
What did we find?
We found that non-flushed coffee is much better drunk within 3 weeks post-roast (ideally around 1.5 weeks). We also found that gas-flushed coffees are at their prime after 2 weeks of shelf time.We have summarized the results in a normalized score vs. weeks post-roast in the figure below. Figure 4: Normalized quantitative results of the coffee freshness studies as a score out of 10. The error bars on the vertical axis indicate variation between tester scores, where error bars on the horizontal axis indicate average variances between light roast and dark roast (centered around ‘medium’ roast). Darker roasts tended to peak and decline earlier (thus the left-bound error bar on each point of data), which is comparable to what we have seen in the literature. At week one, we found that all non-flushed coffees were complex and balanced (stored at 21°C in a store-room). Milk cut-through was good. We found that the flushed coffee was rather harsh when consumed ‘black’ within two weeks, though milk cut-through was noticeably better at this stage. In Australia, over 85% of the market drinks coffee with milk, this this may be a good age in which to use the coffee for the broader market. At 4 weeks, the gas flushed coffee taste was softened, with more complex notes coming into better balance when black. Milk cut-through was still good. At 4 weeks, the non-flushed coffee had lost much of its complexity, becoming a less enjoyable in milk compared to its gas-flushed brother. The non-flushed coffee was still acceptable black, but we would not recommend non-flushed coffees be consumed much later than this, especially in milk. At 8 weeks, the gas-flushed coffee was still delicious. The non-flushed coffee, on the other hand, was described as stale by at least 50% of the testers. This aligns well with what we found in the published literature [1],[2].
Conclusions: Ideal Coffee Freshness
At this stage we can confidently say that if your coffee is not gas flushed, drink it within 3 weeks! If your coffee is older than this, all is not lost: the coffee is still drinkable black up to 8 weeks. If you’re a café owner, you’d do well to use the coffee fresh (within 1-2 weeks of the roast date). This is true for light, medium and dark coffees.` If your coffee is gas flushed, your coffee will stay fresh for over 8 weeks. At no point did the quality decrease over the tested timeframe – in fact it only ever increased (if only slightly), indicating that the coffee is likely to be good for longer than this. Milk cut-through is good throughout its lifetime, though if you want to serve it black, we’d recommend waiting until after 2 weeks to serve. For reference, at Seven Miles, most of our blends are nitrogen gas-flushed – with some exceptions. Get in touch below if you’re after specifics. Where to next? Now that we know our point of reference for flushed and non-flushed coffees, we’ll be delving deeper to understand ageing and freshness more, including:- What chemistry is going on over time? We’ll look at analyzing headspace gases to determine changes in chemical composition over time, including both degassing-rates and oxidation/reduction type reaction rates.
- What rate does oxygen interact with the mixture? We’ll look at doing some oxygen extinction experiments
- What difference does ambient humidity make to staling/aging? We’ll measure water activity over time post-roast
- Finally, we’ll redo some of the taste tests over a longer period of time – using the results of this test as our reference point
If you have questions about this research feel free to drop us a line, or come along to one of our live events. For more on the work of the Coffee Science & Education Centre, click here
[1] doi:10.1006/fstl.2000.0732: Cardelli and Labuzza, Lebensm.-Wiss. u.-Technol., 34, pp. 273-278 (2001) [2] doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2008.01.011: Guerra et al., LWT - Food Science and Technology 41, pp. 2070 – 2078 (2008)